The Nuclear Of Nuclear Weapons - 1635 Words

In the summer of 1962 the USSR deployed nuclear missiles into Cuba for a number of different reasons. With the constant threat of the USA’s nuclear weapons in Turkey and the knowledge that they were nuclear superior to themselves Khrushchev had to make a decision to try and restore the nuclear balance between the super powers. In addition to this it was felt that the USSR had to defend its communist ally from invasion from the USA who were keen to eliminate their leader Fidel Castro. When the nuclear missiles were deployed to Cuba this held a direct threat to the national security of the USA as now Russia’s nuclear weapons were capable of striking some of America’s largest cities. With tension growing the threat of a nuclear war became†¦show more content†¦After Kennedy’s failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba in 1961, the USA sent 15 nuclear missiles near Izmir in Turkey. These missiles held a direct threat to the USSR as it put them in striking ran ge of the USA, which left Khrushchev with a decision to try and protect the national security of the USSR. Khrushchev responded by sending nuclear weapons to Cuba, however Russia’s nuclear weapons where no-where near as advanced as that of the USA and therefore this can be seen as a massive risk. Dr Mervyn Bain (2009, 180) backs this up by stating â€Å"If a total outsider, a ‘man from mars,’ had looked at the situation, he would have seen that the United States had a massive superiority in nuclear weaponry†. Some academics have cited that Khrushchev was not doing this to restore a balance of power between the two countries but his real intention was to protect Cuba. However this view is undermined in his own memoirs where he states: â€Å"The Americans had surrounded our country with military bases and threatened us with nuclear weapons, and now they will learn just what it feels like to have nuclear missiles pointed at you† (Lowe 2002: 366) It is clear to see that Khrushchev was operating for the sole purpose of improving Russia’s image on the world scene. He knew at this point that they were inferior to the USA, but by using this bluff he was able to ensure that Kennedy would offer a compromise and nuclear parity would be restored. This view is emphasised by

Running Head Edgar Allen Poe 1. Edgar Allen Poe2. . .

Running head: EDGAR ALLEN POE 1 EDGAR ALLEN POE 2 Edgar Allen Poe Name Course Professor’s name Institution Date Edgar Allen Poe Edgar Allen Poe is well recognized as the author of numerous great stories of suspense and horror. He also needs to be remembered as the single author who did help in establishing and developing the real contribution of the America to the actual literature of the world, the short-story form (Bagert, 2008). Poe was the initial writer who recognized that short story was some kind of different fiction than the novel and the first person to insist that for the story to have strong impact on the reader, then each and every detail of the story has to make a contribution regarding that effect†¦show more content†¦He struggles so hard to make the literacy work of the American become relevant in all parts of the world. Despite the fact that most of the early criticism developed by Poe was routine review of work, he started in his reviews to make consideration on the basic condition of the poetry as well as short fiction and to come up with some form of theoretical analyses of these two different genres, drawing upon the criticism of the German people on Schlegel and the English criticism of Taylor Samuel Coleridge (Phillips Hayes, 2011). The main contribution made by Poe to the criticism is the discussion he placed on some specific generic features of short fictions in one of his commonly known review of Twice-Told Tales of Nathaniel Hawthorne (Poe, 2012). Poe makes a very much convincing case for the single organic unity of the short fiction, argues very strongly in favor of its dependence based on some form of unified effect and show in a more clear manner how it has close alignment to the poem in question rather than the novel (Phillips Hayes, 2011). Poe’s ideas within the short tale have lived to influence writers of short-story and literary critics since that point in time. Within his theories of the short story, Poe makes an argument that whereas within long works one can always be happy about some kind of passages, within short

Frankenstein vs Planet of the Apes Free Essays

Frankenstein VS Planet of the Apes: A Frightful Showdown Humans as a species like to experiment with the world around them and push the limits of any known law. As a result, the human race is constantly toying with the everlasting puzzle: What is life and how can it be manipulated? Through many realistic fiction stories—such as Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Rise of the Planet of the Apes—the general public is able to take a look into how far the human mind wants to go. Both stories use technology as a vehicle to enhancing human life and end up with horrible endings. We will write a custom essay sample on Frankenstein vs Planet of the Apes or any similar topic only for you Order Now Though these tales share a common theme, they diverge in plot lines by exploring different ways that technology can affect life as usual. By examining these tales one will notice the difference of experiments, consequences, and relationships. The first major difference is the means of experimentation between the two protagonists. In Frankenstein, Victor uses a mysterious â€Å"spark of life† to bring his creation alive in order to fulfill his own ambitions. In Rise of the Planet of the Apes, the protagonist’s motivation for experimenting on life is for the greater good from the get go. By these plots being different, the audience can see how even though scientists can have totally separate ideas and reasoning the end game is usually the same. However, this was not the only difference between the cautionary narratives. The other key thing that made these stories different was the endings. In the film, the experiments wreak havoc on the city just so that they could get to safety. In the novel, the creation causes destruction for the sole purpose of tormenting its creator. The apes reach their destination and though they leave a wake of terror in their path are generally safe and complacent, while the protagonist quietly mourns losing his friend. On the other hand, Victor loses his life in the hunt for the creation and the monster commits suicide leaving no trace of any the events that took place. These two differences are what make each tale unique. The film and novel have one commonality: they warn humans of the dangers that can be self-inflicted. Each story results in suffering, loss, and destruction caused by the creations. They try and convey the message that manipulating life can be a volatile process and should be handled with the utmost care. Though one lead character lives while the other main character dies, they both reach a point where they realize the power and seriousness of their actions therefore teaching the reader/ viewer. Watching/ reading these interesting narratives can leave a person more cautious of their actions and decisions. Overall, the book and film differed in a variety of ways, ways such as plot line and end results. However the overall theme of the power of technology in human lives remained dominant in both tales. One is a film with wonderful visual effects and the other is an aged book that still retains the vividness of its day. They are both striking entertainment and could be interchangeable for instilling a sense of power and responsibly in reckless youth. There were few things that could be tweaked and more informative tales should be made revolving around this universal subject. How to cite Frankenstein vs Planet of the Apes, Papers